Miguel Betances v. Brock Services, LLC, et al.
Docket No. 2016-08-0883
State File No. 59040-2016
Filed August 1, 2017
This is a case before the Appeals Board on interlocutory appeal filed by the employer, and the dispute was whether the employer should be required to provide temporary disability benefits.
Employee alleged suffering an injury to his left hip, left hand, and right elbow on July 18, 2016 from a fall. The Employer accepted the claim as compensation and provided medical care and some temporary disability benefits. Employee continued to work for Employer through July 29, 2016. However, the Employer terminated temporary disability benefits after determining Employee had abandoned his job. Employee contends he did not abandon his job, but was instructed to leave the jobsite from his supervisor because of his complaints of pain from his work-related injuries. Employer provided affidavits that Employee simply stopped showing up for work. The Employer sent a letter to the Employee on September 20, 2016 requesting he return to work since his treating physician had released him to return to work on restricted duty. Employee stated he was out of the country at that time, and did not receive the letter until October 13, 2016. Employee further testified he called the Employer on October 18, 2016 to inquire about returning to work, but was informed his position was no longer available. The trial court found that the Employee’s termination was not for cause and ordered Employer to pay past and ongoing temporary disability benefits.
The appeals board affirmed the decision of the trial court finding no error.
An associate with Spicer Rudstrom since 2009, Courtney focuses her practice on automobile liability, insurance coverage litigation, insurance defense litigation, insurance subrogation, premises liability, products liability and workers’ compensation. She is admitted to practice in all trial and appellate state courts in Tennessee, as well as the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.